Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Holy Dramatic Action!



After researching and viewing much of the work of hugely successful film and TV producer, Jerry Bruckheimer, I think it’s safe to say that the man likes a little bit of action. With major Hollywood hits like, Beverly Hills Cop, Top Gun, Gone in Sixty Seconds, Armageddon, Pearl Harbor, and Pirates of the Caribbean to name a few, and more importantly to this discussion, his best known television series, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, CSI: Miami, CSI: NY, Without a Trace, Cold Case, Amazing Race, and most recently, The Forgotten, it’s clear that Jerry Bruckheimer likes to keep his audiences spellbound with suspense. I must admit he’s reeled me in. I can’t wait to watch the South Florida forensics team of CSI: Miami and the juicy homicide cases under investigation each week. It is through my obsession with problem solving and the perpetual anticipation of what’s going to happen next that I have fallen in love with the work of Mr. Bruckheimer and discovered some of his signature traits. After a brief synopsis of Bruckheimer’s life, I will discuss the significant qualities consistent within much of his work, specifically his television series. I will be particularly addressing the reoccurring themes of dramatic-action and investigation as well as the unswerving textual similarities between many of his currently airing programs. (Jerry Bruckheimer, Wikipedia)

Born in Detroit, Michigan, Bruckheimer did not grow up envisioning himself as one of the most successful film and television producers of all time. Bruckheimer however, always had a passion for photography. He entered several contests when he was younger where he was honored for his ability to see the world in a different way; perhaps this was an inkling to the phenomenal camera work utilized later in his career. He attended the University of Arizona for college where he studied psychology. It also seems to be plausible that his study of human behaviors was put to good use through the dramatic nature of much of his film and television work. His first job after college was in a mailroom of a New York advertising agency. It was here that he got wind of a fellow employee taking off to Hollywood to give the movie-making business a go and where he decided he wanted to give it a chance too. To make a long story short, Bruckheimer connected with Don Simpson (another very successful movie producer) and his career took off. Jerry Bruckheimer has been credited with over 40 box office hits and it is not surprising that he decided to try his hand at television. (Jerry Bruckheimer, Hollywood.com)

Bruckheimer has produced nearly 20 television series since 1997 and has 6 very successful series on the air currently. When asked in several interviews about the premise for much of his work he simply suggests that he makes things that he would want to go see himself. He has also revealed that an important element emphasized in many of his films and television series is the feeling of emotional triumph. With nearly all of his most successful television series being based on the investigation of brutal homicides past and present, the characters within the program and the audience watching both portray and actually feel a sense of triumph or success when the investigation is solved. This is an important audience/character connection pertinent to the success of these series. Aside from the dialogue and physical proceedings of the characters in theses programs, the dramatic action that takes place to trigger these reciprocal actions are also a repetitive thematic motif entangled within Bruckheimer’s work. Obviously homicide investigation is a serious topic and provides much drama, specifically pertaining to the discovery of the dead bodies and then the reactions of the families. The intense action that is then taken to identify the killers of the victims is what gives the programs their suspense. (Galloway, Starinterview, Youtube)

When specifically taking a look at three of his hit television series, CSI: Miami, Cold Case, and new this fall, The Forgotten, the similarities between the three were seemingly endless. One of the most prominent similarities, aside from the fact that they are all about homicide investigations, is the use of flashbacks to orient the viewer with an event that took place before the present time. Every one of these shows inserts flashbacks throughout each episode. These flashbacks are necessary to understanding the events of the murder and help to progress the episode to conclusion. Another similarity the three programs share is the use of Extreme Long Shots, specifically aerial shots to familiarize the viewers with the location of the episode. These shots are seen several times throughout each episode to reestablish location. Also conclusive in all three programs is the use of Extreme Close Up shots, specifically when looking at evidence from the crime scenes. Often times the camera is directed on the object being studied, for instance a piece of glass with a fingerprint on it. Beyond the similar filming criteria used in all of the programs, they also all contain like costuming (professional attire), the use of suspenseful music and sound effects (i.e. flashing camera sounds while still images of the crime scene are visible), and the presence of sets (a mock laboratory or police office) and on site locations for filming. All of these elements work together to create an overall feeling for each program.

Through my exploration of Jerry Bruckheimer and his incredible achievements in both film and television, I have concluded that he is a man who likes to portray what he’s interested in on to the screen. When it comes to his television series he is clearly inspired by human behavior with the overwhelming amount of promgrams he’s produced based on homicide investigations. His work is noted for action and drama, both being emphasized through extraordinary filming techniques. Obviously Bruckheimer’s work is of great popularity and it is without question that his success will continue—at the very least, I know I’ll still be watching.

Bibliography

Galloway, Stephen. "Jerry Bruckheimer, producer." The Hollywood Reporter. 17 Nov. 2003. Web. 13 Oct. 2009. .

"Jerry Bruckheimer." Hollywood.com. Web. 13 Oct. 2009. .

"Jerry Bruckheimer." Wikipedia. Web. 13 Oct. 2009. .

“Starinterview Jerry Bruckheimer.” Youtube. Web. 13 Oct. 2009. .

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Why Is TV So Mesmerizing?

Before I started taking the class Television Criticism I would watch TV seemingly like everyone else does—for the pure entertainment of it. I never stopped to think about the deeper meanings embedded within the plotline of every TV show in existence. Only being in this class for the last couple of weeks, I am in no way an expert on the subject, but I like to think that I could be a guide for you and your own television criticism experience. In my first post, I want to persuade you that my opinion is worth your consideration, but more importantly, influence you to make your own judgments about the wonderful world of television. I will be making clear what my goals for doing TV criticism are, establishing my view of television as an object of study, and determining how I intend to relate to you, my readers.

Being that I have lived in a sorority house for the majority of the last two years of my life, I can’t say that I’ve watched as much TV as I normally would. We don’t have cable in our bedrooms so I’ve been living off of TV on DVD for what seems like forever! I can’t even begin to express how jealous I am of those of you who can just walk in your room, plop on your bed, and turn the TV on to watch whatever you want. Aside from this, I have accumulated quite the collection of TV series on DVD. I must say I love a good episode of Grey’s Anatomy or Sex in the City before I hit the sheets. I became interested in TV criticism after realizing how much I took TV watching for granted. After moving into the sorority house and loosing my accessibility to cable galore, I appreciate the little TV I watch a lot more. My purpose in creating this TV criticism blog is not to moderate whether or not TV is good or bad but to determine what I like and why I like it. O’Donnell (2007) explains, that the advantages of performing television criticism is that “you will not only be able to make informed judgments about the television programs you watch, but also you will better understand your reaction and the reactions of others who share the experience of watching” (3). Sillars and Gronbeck (2001) explain that a critical analysis is broken down into three parts, “describing, interpreting, and evaluating human communication events” (7). It is through these ideas that I hope to not only gain a richer understanding of society but a greater understanding of myself as a viewer through the television I choose to watch. My criticism is not meant to particularly judge something in a negative way, but rather to engage others with my interpretation of what’s “really” going on in a television program.

As I mentioned above, my ability to watch “real” TV at home is nearly impossible, but it seems as though I can’t go anywhere without finding a TV close by to get my fix. In some way TV is an important part of our societies everyday life. Whether we’re watching it out of boredom, to get information about what’s happening in the world, or to catch the next episode of our favorite series, we are constantly being affected by it. With television being such an integral part of everything we do, how could we not study it? TV is a complicated medium however, and according to Corner (1999), “there has undoubtedly been anxiety about its influence” specifically about the “distortion of politics” and the “displacement of culture” (4). There are so many different programs being dispersed through television’s flow that there are bound to be “good” and “bad” programs, both, being watched by TV’s viewers and influencing their opinions. This is unavoidable. I don’t believe that everything on TV is corrupting society nor do I think it is all mind-expanding, but I do believe this is where the freedom of being a critic is very valuable. You and I have the opportunity to determine for ourselves what we believe to be true and false and to discover an understanding of why we choose it to be that way.

Every person brings their own unique perspective to the critics couch and that’s why I would like to invite you to write about what you think, along side me. What do you like to watch and why do you like to watch it? Are you like me and get can enough of the suspense looming throughout a CSI: Miami episode? Or do you prefer a good laugh with the gang of It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia? We all have our own ideas about what’s “good TV” and the advantage of thinking critically about it, is that we can better understand each other’s opinions. Perhaps through these posts we can settle on an idea for why TV is so important in our lives and how, at least for me, I can’t imagine living without it!

References

Corner, J. (1999). Critical Ideas in Television Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.

O’Donnell, V. (2007). Television Criticism. New York: Sage.

Sillars, M. O. and Gronbeck, B. E. (2001). Communication Criticism: Rhetoric, Social Codes, Cultural Studies. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Wednesday, September 2, 2009